Title: Waiting
for Godot (1953) - France
Written By
Samuel Beckett (1906 – 1989)
This analysis
will be broken down into 4 different titles:
1. Spiritual absurdity
2. An Aimless existence
3. Chaotic conviction
4. Confined Condition
Each of these will
study different features from the play
in relation to its context and social aspects.
Spiritual
Absurdity
Throughout Waiting for Godot the exposure of certain
behavioral features shown by the characters as well as the lack of sensation
within the ambient shows the audience a reflection of some feelings European
society was trying to cope with. In this case, particularly French culture was
trying to overcome the brutal suffering that resulted from the World War; this
left an atmosphere of depression and emptiness.
With regard to the play, the main parallel that
relates directly with the ideas involving the lack of sensibility is reflected
through the characters. Estragon and Vladimir are the greatest influences on
the audience as they are the main characters, they show strong traits based on
the absurd. Both of these characters embody a weak personality, even
considering their physical aspects they exhibit a messy figure. The main
behavioral features related to the absurd within these characters are mainly delivered
as the audience can clearly perceive a lack of rationality. The absence of
coherence and reason leaves them in an unstable reality which lacks the values
that could lead them to a spiritual balance. There is a strong sense of a lack
of sense rationality and logic. By making a contrast with this attitudes and
the context of the play we can find a significant resemblance when it comes to
the suffering of a spiritual crisis. In context, we take into consideration the
post WW France; there was a great deal of suffering involved due to the war,
moral depression, discouragement in addition to political and economic problems
left a society which seemed lost and
weak. This sense of weakness manifest throughout the play particularly
reflected in Lucky’s character, he represents an impersonated dependence to the
extent that clearly exposes it as slavery. In general the audience easily sense
a personal incapacity interpreted by all the characters but Pozzo , he
represents control and empowerment (except for one case in which his role is
switched with Lucky’s) in an aggressive and violent way, completely ignoring
Lucky’s welfare his constant demands show a reckless abuse. In my opinion Pozzo represents the absence of
affection and compassion and the search for power through violence and abuse,
attitudes which are well related to countries throughout war.
Another component which is very important consists of
the mood, the overall spaces and prevailing atmosphere within the play. The
scenario consists of a deserted place with a tree, apart from the characters
this is the only sign of nature and live; in this case the tree is a “naked
tree” with no leafs. This suggest an absence of vital essence in the atmosphere
with relates directly with the characters but all the same time it can
symbolize the loss and destruction of a physical entity considering that
previously that tree was covered in leaves.
In general this aspect of emptiness area is closely related to the
destruction cause by wars in certain places.
Overall the presence of the absurd in waiting for
Godot shows the audience the absence of vital essence as a result of war and
destruction, not only in the external physical spaces but as an emotional
damage to the population. The incapacities of communicating reflect the lack of
freedom and a difficult context.
An Aimless
Existence
In context with regard to the play’s theme,
existentialism and the absurd play a great role. This consists of attitudes
which cannot explain each other, the attempt made by individuals to show an
ethic and rational behavior is only an inquiry without purpose.
In this case we can appreciate the characters adapting
this behavior as they don’t seem to have a rational interaction between them
and at the same time the lack of purpose in their actions in imminent. During
the 1950’s existentialism became a strong ideology in which individuals would
question their lives and their ways of thinking. Waiting for Godot offers
readers a perspective on a situation which involves a group of people having a
senseless existence, this scenario is a completely open as it represents the
main aspects of existentialism.
Existentialism and the absurd seem to be originated
out of crisis as a way to reflect on the current situation in order to find a
solution for the problems suffered by society.
The absurd and human reason have no relation at all, the absurd embraces
a lack of rationality with no purpose and meaning. Individuals just live their
lives as if they were dragged to their destination, they don’t make any effort
to create a character and build and identity, actions rely on impulses which
have no purpose of correspondence in their reality. During the play the main
charaters don’t seem to have any purpose for their actions let alone their existence,
they are completely clueless on what their true living potential might be and
they focus their time energy and live on “waiting” doing nothing, letting
themselves be dragged by time so they can be taken by a greater power that puts
them away from their misery.
Chaotic
Conviction
There is a strong sense of vital chaos in the pay,
behaviors suggesting distress and fear showing a living agony which consumes
the characters. In a society as a whole this problem can cause negative
feelings such as discouragement and insecurity due to the feeling of social
distress, these attitudes are imminent behind the play.
Some philosophical tendencies state that society has
the conviction to suffering without being capable of avoiding it, values are
left unattended and an atmosphere of sheer pessimism consumes human condition.
In post war Europe there was a crisis which caused pain to individuals as well
as worry and idleness regarding their own future. This tense atmosphere could
compromise their mental sanity and overall state of well-being. In the play the
idea of the characters involved in a feeling of agony and discouragement is
very apparent as their lives is based on the possibility that a greater
presence could save them, the willingness to give up their lives to this empty
faith is unquestionable and as a result they give away the purpose of their
existence. Behind this action lies a clear insecurity on how their own being
could provide them with the adequate lifestyle and as a result they seek for
someone to provide them with total guidance, basically giving their live away,
as if they were puppets. With regard to the other characters Pozzo is a another
figure which is suggested to represent insecurity as he enjoys practicing
slavery and becoming a figure of authority, attitude which is adapted by
individuals who think that in order for them to prove themselves to be capable,
influential and powerful is by the use of violence and the desire to control
and produce misery into others’ lives. At one point these roles are reversed,
this shows that an individual’s position when it comes to authority and control
over others can never be taken as granted; in relation with the play if we
consider social movements the same sense of empowerment and the change of roles
can be certain.
Overall in the play we can appreciate how the main
characters concede their existence to a belief which seems to have no logical
explanation, purely based in faith. This lack of self-sufficiency leads to
a full dependency which leaves them with
a self-destructive existence which expires with every instant.
Confined
Condition
Existentialism and the absurd represent permanent
social distress and confinement. Human tend to question their destiny in a
hostile environment, this attitudes pressures the ways of thinking in some
cases, the sense of cultivating a belief
and becoming indifferent to reality was a more viable option than acting on
what seemed to be (according to their approach) a reality full of suppression.
In society and under unstable circumstances (such as a
post war era) it is hard for people to gain confidence and empowerment to fight
back the adversities when they are on crisis. Under this circumstances
individuals tend to give in easily to greater adversities without willing to
take a major risk. In Europe following the recoil and constrains that resulted
after war there was economies left in an unstable condition, political
instability and social anxiety. These feelings left the people with an internal
sensation of weakness and dependence and confinement as they were under
constant pressure and risk.
During the play it’s clear that Vladimir and Estragon
have created a lifestyle which revolves around the idea of submission when they
find themselves practically lost in the middle of an empty location they assume
that their willingness and power to overcome such situation is not sufficient
and as a result they choose to rather ignore their possibilities to overcome
such constrains and decide to wait for a savior. Another character which
clearly shows this condition is Lucky as his lifestyle is fully controlled by
Pozzo and there seems to be no way of overcoming such oppression, even
physically Lucky struggles to be fully functional.
In general the idea of confinement, which is closely
related to existentialism and the absurd, is evident through the play. If we
take into account context we can also deduce that this condition is a automatic
tendency that takes place when facing a difficult situation.
It is really helpful..
ReplyDeleteGreat 👌
ReplyDelete